The Reading Room

Battle Rock, Port Orford, 1851: Nine Men on a Sea-Stack

The rock is still there. It sits just off the beach at Port Orford on the southern Oregon coast, a blunt headland of basalt that the tide cuts off and then gives back. In June 1851 a sea-captain named William Tichenor put nine men on top of it, handed them a cannon, and sailed away. He meant to come back in two weeks with more settlers and supplies. By the time anyone returned, the men were gone and the ground had a new name.

This is the story the southern coast tells about its own beginning, and it is worth telling carefully, because almost everything we know about it was written by the people who landed there. The Quatomah, the band of the Tututni people whose country this was, left no letters. Their version survives in fragments and later interviews, in the spaces the settlers' accounts leave open. Keep that in mind through all of it.

The push up the coast

To understand why nine men were sitting on a sea-stack with a cannon, begin with the gold rush. The strikes in California pulled people to the Pacific coast in enormous numbers over a few short years, and San Francisco swelled from a village into a port that had to be fed, supplied, and tied to everywhere else. Ships worked the water between San Francisco and the mouth of the Columbia, carrying passengers and freight north and south, and every captain on that run understood that whoever held a good harbor along the way stood to profit from it. The southern Oregon coast was the long unimproved stretch in the middle, rocky and roadless, with no settled harbor between the two ends of the route.

Tichenor's plan was a speculation of exactly that kind. A town at Port Orford would be a supply stop, a landing for freight, and, if the country behind it opened, a doorway to the interior. Planting men on the rock was how a claim got made in practice. It put bodies on the ground, established a presence a later court or land office could recognize, and staked the harbor before another captain thought to. The cannon belonged to the same logic. It announced that the claim would be defended, and it fixed the people already living there in the role of an obstacle, something to be managed on the way to a town.

The people whose beach it was

The Quatomah were one of many small, self-governing bands that shared the Athabaskan speech of the lower Rogue and the coast around it, the cluster the record files under the name Tututni. Their world was built on the water. The rivers ran with salmon in season, the tide flats and the ocean gave shellfish and sea mammals, and the forest behind the beach filled out the rest of the year. People lived in permanent plank-house villages at the good sites, the mouths of streams and the sheltered coves, and the country was settled and worked, with owners and boundaries and a long memory of who belonged where. The harbor Tichenor wanted was already somebody's home shore, and a valuable one, worked and defended long before the Sea Gull ever came over the horizon.

That matters for reading what happened next. When somewhere around forty of them came down to the beach and up the path against the cannon, they were the owners of the place answering an armed trespass on it. That is the fact the name Battle Rock buries. The settler record turned the defense of a home shore into the aggression of a nameless horde, and the map has kept the settler's word for it ever since.

The men on the rock

Tichenor was a steamboat captain and a speculator who wanted a supply town on the run between San Francisco and the Columbia. In early June he ran his ship, the Sea Gull, into the little harbor at Port Orford and landed nine men under a carpenter named J.M. Kirkpatrick. He left them a brass four-pounder cannon off the ship, promised to return in fourteen days, and steamed south. The ship was held up in San Francisco, and his return slipped past the promise by days that turned into weeks.

The men did not wait quietly. They had landed uninvited in occupied country, and the Quatomah came down to the beach to make that plain. The settlers withdrew to the top of the rock, dragged the cannon up after them, and loaded it. By Kirkpatrick's account the morning after they fortified the height, somewhere around forty Quatomah moved on the camp. The cannon was already laid on the path up. When it fired into them at close range it killed, in his first telling, "some six or eight."

Over roughly the next two weeks the nine men held the rock against further assaults, using rifles and the cannon. Then they slipped off it, came down under cover, and walked north overland until they reached the settlement at Gardiner on the Umpqua, about a month after they had been dropped. Tichenor, returning to an empty rock, assumed they were dead. They were not. They had simply abandoned the place and saved themselves.

The rock itself did much of the work. A sea-stack is a natural fort, water on most sides, a single climbable approach, and a flat top from which a few defenders can watch every direction at once. Nine men in the open on that beach would not have lasted long. Nine men on the height, with a cannon laid on the one path up, could make a numerical disadvantage survivable for as long as their powder held. What reads in the settler accounts as courage was in large part the ground choosing for them. They had picked, or been handed, the one piece of the shore where a tiny party could hold off a much larger one, and the Quatomah were forced to come at them uphill, into the mouth of the gun.

Whose account, and how much of it

Kirkpatrick told the story twice, and the two versions do not match. The first was a letter written soon after, in 1851, plain and close to the event. The second came in 1898, when he was seventy, and it had grown. In the later telling the air is full of arrows, the attackers number "at least one hundred," and the nine men hold off the assault with a kind of frontier heroism the first letter never claimed. A Portland State study by Adam Fitzhugh that set the two side by side concluded the bluntest thing you can say about a primary source: the old man had invented much of the second story.

It is worth sitting with why the story grew the way it did. A last stand is a useful shape for a settlement to remember itself in. It casts the newcomers as the besieged and the people whose land they had taken as the aggressors, and it turns a real-estate venture backed by a cannon into a tale of endurance. By 1898 the coast Kirkpatrick was describing had been settled for the better part of a lifetime, the Quatomah were long gone from it, and no one was left at the table to contradict him. The arrows multiply and the attackers swell to a hundred because a larger enemy makes for a braver defense, and a braver defense makes the settlement's founding a thing to be proud of. Fitzhugh's side-by-side reading matters because it catches the machinery at work. The same source, the same man, hands us both the plainer event and the legend the event became.

So the figures move. Settler-leaning sources put the Quatomah dead between ten and twenty; Kirkpatrick's own earliest number was lower. The truth is that nobody counted who would have counted honestly, and the people who could have given the other side of it were already being pushed off the record. When you read that "between ten and twenty" Native people were killed defending their own beach, read it as the settlers' arithmetic, offered by the side that fired the cannon.

The numbers are worth pressing on for a moment, because they are doing more than counting. Every figure in this story reaches us through the people who fired the cannon or the people who came after them, and each was chosen, consciously or not, to serve the telling. A low count of Quatomah dead keeps the founding tidy. A high count of attackers makes the defense heroic. The one number nobody offers is the one that would matter most, the tally of what the Quatomah lost across the whole of it, the villages emptied and the people removed, because that number was never anyone's job to keep. Reading these sources well means holding every count loosely and asking, each time, who benefited from it landing where it did.

What is not in dispute is the shape of it. A captain dropped men on a rock in country that was not his to give. The people of that country resisted. The men killed some of them with artillery, held out, and ran. The harbor became Port Orford, the rock became Battle Rock, and the name fixed the settlers' framing into the map. There is a wayside park there now. The Quatomah and their relations were eventually removed to the Siletz and Grande Ronde reservations, where their descendants live today as part of the Confederated Tribes.

The T'Vault massacre and the road that wasn't

Battle Rock did not stay an isolated incident. It was the opening of a longer killing on the southern coast that the histories fold into the Rogue River War.

That September, with Port Orford now a foothold, a party set out under William Green T'Vault to find an inland route from the coast to the Oregon–California trail. T'Vault started with more than twenty men; rough country and short supplies thinned the party until only about ten were still with him when they reached the Coquille River north of Port Orford. There they hired Coquille men with canoes to take them downriver. At the village near the mouth of the Coquille the canoes touched shore and the thing came apart. A fight broke out, the explorers were attacked, and five of the men were killed. Three made it out, one of them badly wounded with arrows in his back, and walked for days to the Umpqua in wretched shape.

The Coquille remembered it differently, and their memory carries the part the settler accounts leave out. In the Native narratives the attack is not an ambush out of nowhere but an answer to what was already happening to them, and what followed the fight was worse than the fight. Soldiers came. Lieutenant Colonel Silas Casey of the U.S. Army reached Port Orford that fall, and in November his command struck a Coquille village on the river and killed an estimated fifteen people. That was the opening of a longer campaign against the Coquille, and their accounts of these years remember settlers firing the houses at night and a father and son burning to death inside. Another remembers the end of it in a single line:

"When I grew up, all the Coquille people were killed off, only a few old women being alive."

That is the cost the word "massacre" usually fails to carry. The T'Vault massacre killed five white men and is named for them. The reprisals it triggered, and the war it helped open, fell on whole villages.

The war the rock helped open

Set the three events in a line and the pattern is hard to miss. Settlers land where they have no standing. The people of the country resist. The resistance is answered with force out of all proportion to it, and that force falls hardest on those who had the least to do with the first quarrel. Battle Rock, the T'Vault party, and Casey's strike on the Coquille are three turns of the same ratchet, and each turn made the coast harder to hold by any means short of the gun.

Gold turning up in the interior tightened everything. Strikes in the mountains behind the coast brought miners into country that was not theirs to enter, and volunteer companies formed to clear the way for them. These are the years the histories gather under the Rogue River War, a stop-and-start campaign of raids, reprisals, and broken agreements that ran through the first half of the 1850s. It ended the way such campaigns generally ended in Oregon. The surviving bands of the coast and the Rogue were rounded up and marched to the reservations at Siletz and Grande Ronde, set far enough from their own country that returning to it was made a crime. The land they were taken from was the land the town at Port Orford had been built to reach.

The character of that campaign is worth naming plainly. Much of the killing was done by local volunteer companies raised from the mining camps and settlements, men who stood to gain directly from clearing the country and who often outran the regular army sent to keep a lid on things. The line between a war and a run of raids on villages blurs in these years, because on the ground it frequently was raids on villages. Casey's strike on the Coquille sits inside that pattern. So does the burning of houses at night that the Coquille narratives remember. When the record calls all of this a war, the word does some quiet work, lending the orderly sound of a campaign to what was in many places the destruction of settled communities by their new neighbors.

Where the witness reaches the end of the line

A guide and interpreter named Enos moves through this coastal violence, and the southern coast is where his road runs out. He was a man of the trails before he was anything else, identified in the records as French and Indian, said to have crossed the continent as a guide on John C. Frémont's expeditions in the 1840s. He spoke English easily and could pass on either side of the line the settlers were drawing. He turns up again here, on the Rogue and at the Coquille, and the settler accounts put him at the center of the trouble, the T'Vault attack among it.

How much of that is fair is another question the sources cannot settle, because the sources are the settlers. Some accounts make Enos the instigator of everything that went wrong on the coast. Others, including a Tichenor account, put him inside the settlers' own fort during the worst of it, carrying food to the besieged. The man finally hanged at Port Orford, on Battle Rock, in the mid-1850s was condemned on testimony that ranges from damning to absent depending on who tells it; by one account a justice ordered him released for lack of evidence and a crowd took him anyway. There is even a claim the wrong man was hanged. We have laid out what can and cannot be known about him on a separate page about Enos, worth reading before you decide what to make of his name. The thread runs back, too, to the killing at Klamath Lake in 1846, where the witness first appears.

The rock closes the circle in a way almost too neat to credit, and yet it holds. The same promontory the settlers named for their own defense is where they later put Enos to death. A place first written into the record as a fort became a gallows, and the man hanged on it was one of the people that fort had been raised against, a guide who had spent his life on the very trails the whole enterprise depended on. Whatever he did or did not do on the Rogue and the Coquille, he was tried and killed inside the same machinery that had already decided what Battle Rock meant. The people who controlled the story controlled the rope.

Stand on the beach today and the commemoration all runs one way. There is a wayside park, the name on the map, and the story of nine men who held out, and there is very little that speaks for the people who came down that path and did not walk away from it. The archive tilts the same direction. It keeps Kirkpatrick's two tellings, T'Vault's account of his own survival, and Tichenor's version of events, and it holds almost nothing in the Quatomah's own words. This is what it looks like when one side writes the history and then raises the monument to it.

The novel The Renegade Enos: Witness to the American West follows that thread to this beach. It ends at the gallows, with Enos's last words in French: Je te vois. I see you. That is the book's scene rather than the historical record, and I want to keep the two apart on purpose. The record gives us a contested man hanged on a contested rock, on evidence the people who hanged him controlled. The novel asks what such a man saw. You can follow the whole arc from the southern coast back to where it began.

Sources & further reading

This is one of the pieces behind The Renegade Enos: Witness to the American West, a novel by H.L. Delaney, forthcoming from Basalt Sea Press. Get launch news →

← All pieces